The Oyo State Government has stated categorically that there is no confirmed case of diphtheria anywhere in the State. It described as false and reckless the claims of the Senator Sharafadeen Alli Campaign Organisation (SSACO), whose latest statement paints a public health emergency that the surveillance data do not support. By inflating the outbreak and distorting immunisation figures, SSACO has again shown a readiness to trade in falsehood for political gain, at the risk of public safety.

According to surveillance information provided by the Honourable Commissioner for Health, Dr. Oluwaserimi Ajetunmobi, SSACO’s claim that diphtheria is affecting “several Local Government Areas” across Oyo State is entirely false. SSACO listed 16 LGAs as affected, including Atisbo, Ibadan North West, Oyo West, Akinyele, Saki, Egbeda, Oriire, Ibadan North, Ibadan South West, Iwajowa, Ona Ara, Atiba, Lagelu, Ogbomosho North, Surulere and Oluyole. However, official figures from the Ministry of Health’s Diphtheria Outbreak Surveillance Update (Epidemiological Week 40, 2026) show suspected cases in only 10 LGAs, and none has been confirmed. SSACO’s inflated geography is a fabrication capable of causing needless public anxiety.

The Government notes, with concern, SSACO’s growing propensity for deploying lies and misinformation in pursuit of political traction. Its latest claims follow a familiar pattern in which public health matters are distorted, data are cherry picked, and fear is manufactured to score political points. This behaviour is reckless, unbecoming of any organisation that claims to serve the public, and wholly unacceptable in matters as sensitive as disease surveillance and childhood immunisation.
Dr. Ajetunmobi further explained that, despite the absence of confirmed cases, the Ministry has taken all necessary preparedness and response measures.

The Public Health Emergency Operations Centre has procured antibiotic supplies and requested buffer stock of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT). Rapid response teams have been activated promptly for suspected cases in line with the 7 1 7 framework, and suspected cases have been isolated and treated at the Infectious Disease Centre, Olodo, using DAT and appropriate antibiotics. These steps reflect a government that takes public health seriously and acts proactively to protect its people.

Equally misleading is SSACO’s claim that Oyo State ranks at the bottom of South West childhood immunisation coverage. SSACO asserted that Oyo moved from 51.3% in the 2024 NDHS to 55.0% in the 2025–26 survey and therefore ranks last in the region. This claim is false. Verified NmDHS 2025–26 data show that Oyo State’s basic antigen coverage is at the South West average, while its national schedule coverage exceeds the zonal average. For children aged 24–35 months, Oyo’s full national schedule coverage is above the South West average. SSACO’s figures are invented, and the official data completely dismantle the “bottom of the region” narrative.

The Government also notes SSACO’s attempt to portray Oyo State’s participation in the Immunization Plus component of the IMPACT Project as evidence of failure. This is misleading. Participation in IMPACT is a fact, not an indictment. SSACO’s own text describes a multi component project, yet it sets cumulative receipts against a single immunisation indicator in a manner that is analytically unsound. The funds received under IMPACT are not free money, and the Government has used them strictly for their intended purposes. If SSACO alleges mismanagement, it must specify what, where, and how, and present evidence—rather than juxtapose unrelated figures with unverified outbreak claims.

Regarding SSACO’s demand for publication of IMPACT reports, the Government reiterates that IMPACT financial and implementation reporting follows the project’s established audit and disclosure framework. The Ministry of Health welcomes scrutiny through appropriate channels, including the audit process. Scrutiny is legitimate; using an unverified outbreak as a stage for political messaging is not.

In the end, the facts speak for themselves: there is no confirmed diphtheria case in Oyo State, the LGAs listed by SSACO are not supported by surveillance data, and the immunisation figures it circulated collapse under the weight of verified national statistics. What SSACO has chosen to do; turning an unverified outbreak into a political tool, inflate geography, and manufacture rankings, is reckless and deeply irresponsible. Oyo State will continue to respond to every suspected case with urgency, protect every child through vaccination, and publish only accurate, evidence based information. What the Government will not do is allow public health matters to be twisted into instruments of political fear. The people of Oyo State deserve clarity, not concoctions; facts, not fabrications. The truth is clear, the response is active, and the falsehoods have been exposed.

The Oyo State Government has stated categorically that there is no confirmed case of diphtheria anywhere in the State. It described as false and reckless the claims of the Senator Sharafadeen Alli Campaign Organisation (SSACO), whose latest statement paints a public health emergency that the surveillance data do not support. By inflating the outbreak and distorting immunisation figures, SSACO has again shown a readiness to trade in falsehood for political gain, at the risk of public safety.

According to surveillance information provided by the Honourable Commissioner for Health, Dr. Oluwaserimi Ajetunmobi, SSACO’s claim that diphtheria is affecting “several Local Government Areas” across Oyo State is entirely false. SSACO listed 16 LGAs as affected, including Atisbo, Ibadan North West, Oyo West, Akinyele, Saki, Egbeda, Oriire, Ibadan North, Ibadan South West, Iwajowa, Ona Ara, Atiba, Lagelu, Ogbomosho North, Surulere and Oluyole. However, official figures from the Ministry of Health’s Diphtheria Outbreak Surveillance Update (Epidemiological Week 40, 2026) show suspected cases in only 10 LGAs, and none has been confirmed. SSACO’s inflated geography is a fabrication capable of causing needless public anxiety.

The Government notes, with concern, SSACO’s growing propensity for deploying lies and misinformation in pursuit of political traction. Its latest claims follow a familiar pattern in which public health matters are distorted, data are cherry picked, and fear is manufactured to score political points. This behaviour is reckless, unbecoming of any organisation that claims to serve the public, and wholly unacceptable in matters as sensitive as disease surveillance and childhood immunisation.
Dr. Ajetunmobi further explained that, despite the absence of confirmed cases, the Ministry has taken all necessary preparedness and response measures.

The Public Health Emergency Operations Centre has procured antibiotic supplies and requested buffer stock of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT). Rapid response teams have been activated promptly for suspected cases in line with the 7 1 7 framework, and suspected cases have been isolated and treated at the Infectious Disease Centre, Olodo, using DAT and appropriate antibiotics. These steps reflect a government that takes public health seriously and acts proactively to protect its people.

Equally misleading is SSACO’s claim that Oyo State ranks at the bottom of South West childhood immunisation coverage. SSACO asserted that Oyo moved from 51.3% in the 2024 NDHS to 55.0% in the 2025–26 survey and therefore ranks last in the region. This claim is false. Verified NmDHS 2025–26 data show that Oyo State’s basic antigen coverage is at the South West average, while its national schedule coverage exceeds the zonal average. For children aged 24–35 months, Oyo’s full national schedule coverage is above the South West average. SSACO’s figures are invented, and the official data completely dismantle the “bottom of the region” narrative.

The Government also notes SSACO’s attempt to portray Oyo State’s participation in the Immunization Plus component of the IMPACT Project as evidence of failure. This is misleading. Participation in IMPACT is a fact, not an indictment. SSACO’s own text describes a multi component project, yet it sets cumulative receipts against a single immunisation indicator in a manner that is analytically unsound. The funds received under IMPACT are not free money, and the Government has used them strictly for their intended purposes. If SSACO alleges mismanagement, it must specify what, where, and how, and present evidence—rather than juxtapose unrelated figures with unverified outbreak claims.

Regarding SSACO’s demand for publication of IMPACT reports, the Government reiterates that IMPACT financial and implementation reporting follows the project’s established audit and disclosure framework. The Ministry of Health welcomes scrutiny through appropriate channels, including the audit process. Scrutiny is legitimate; using an unverified outbreak as a stage for political messaging is not.

In the end, the facts speak for themselves: there is no confirmed diphtheria case in Oyo State, the LGAs listed by SSACO are not supported by surveillance data, and the immunisation figures it circulated collapse under the weight of verified national statistics. What SSACO has chosen to do; turning an unverified outbreak into a political tool, inflate geography, and manufacture rankings, is reckless and deeply irresponsible. Oyo State will continue to respond to every suspected case with urgency, protect every child through vaccination, and publish only accurate, evidence based information. What the Government will not do is allow public health matters to be twisted into instruments of political fear. The people of Oyo State deserve clarity, not concoctions; facts, not fabrications. The truth is clear, the response is active, and the falsehoods have been exposed.