Three sons of the former Registrar of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB); Prof. Dibu Ojerinde have been fingered to be involved in the N900 million stationery fraud filed against the former JAMB Boss by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commissions (ICPC).
According to a recent statement by the anti-corruption agency, it claimed its operatives arrested Ojerinde in Abuja on March. 15, 2021 over allegations that he misappropriated about N900 million while heading JAMB and the National Examination Council (NECO).
In documents they filed before the Federal High Court, Ojerinde’s lawyers revealed that ICPC had extended its investigation to include the ex-JAMB boss’ children.
In an affidavit filed along with an application, the lawyers claimed the ICPC (listed as the sole respondent) has extended its investigation to three of Ojerinde’s children.
They said: “The respondent has now further invited the applicant’s children, Mr. Adedayo Ojerinde, Hon. Olumide Ojerinde and Dr. Oluwaseun Ojerinde.”
The lawyers added that the ICPC has written the children “to come to their office for questioning based on realm of speculations, and this also is an attempt to restrain the liberty of the children in a bid to frustrate the applicant and his family.”
Lilian Nwazue, of the firm, K. S. Olorunishola & Co, said although the ICPC had earlier granted Ojerinde a conditional administrative bail which he met, the commission invited him last week and suddenly altered the conditions.
Nwazue further claimed that the new conditions “are very inhibitive which is indicative that the respondent does not want to allow the applicant bail.”
Recall that Ojerinde’s lawyer; K. S. Olorunishola had on March 29, 2021, moved a fundamental rights enforcement application which will enable the former JAMB boss to enjoy some form of administrative bail pending his arraignment in court.
However, the presiding judge; Justice Inyang Ekwo, hinted that the circumstances surrounding Ojerinde’s case as described by his lawyer, have nothing to do with breach in fundamental human rights at this time.
Justice Ekwo held that; should Ojerinde be eventually arraigned before a court, there are legal provisions for bail upon arraignment, which the lawyer can explore.
He however cautioned Olorunishola to be cautious about exploiting this legal opportunity.
“Though the court has the power to allow the administrative bail to continue, I do not think I can exercise power for him to be released on administrative bail,” he said.
The ICPC, in its statement, claimed Ojerinde has been detained by the Commission for questioning over allegations of multiple identities, abuse of office, money laundering, tax evasion and making false statements to public officials.
“The former JAMB boss is also being questioned by the Commission for allegedly awarding fraudulent contracts to shell companies which cannot be traced.
“He was alleged to have awarded contracts for the supply of pencil and eraser at the cost of N450 million each, to Double 07 Concept Limited and Pristine Global Concept Limited, respectively, between 2013 and 2014 while heading JAMB.
“There is no evidence to show that the items which are examination materials were supplied as the contractors cannot be found.
“Similar contracts were allegedly awarded to Solid Figures Limited, Holywalk Limited and other companies for various sums without any trace of executions.”
Nwazue added, in the supporting affidavit to the fundamental rights enforcement application that Ojerinde “is being investigated by the officers of the respondent over allegations of offence(s).
“He has been on the administrative bail of the respondent for about a year or thereabouts and he has never jumped bail and/or refused to honour any invitation of the respondent at any time
“He was invited by the respondent for an appointment which he promptly honoured by taking flight all the way from Ilorin, Kwara State to Abuja, FCT having had to leave Abuja for urgent medical treatment.
“Upon his arrival at the office of the respondent in Abuja his biometrics was taken and made to write a statement after which, he was given a letter purportedly revoking his bail and at the same time, admitting him to bail on other inhibitive conditions.
“The applicant has every reason to believe that the respondent is deliberately using its office to deny the applicant his right to personal liberty and freedom of movement and intimidate him.
“The applicant is on medication because of his deteriorating health and any act curtailing his personal liberty will only deny him access to good health care as he needs to constantly see his doctor because of his health conditions.
“The new bail conditions given by the respondent are very inhibitive which is indicative that the respondent does not want to allow the applicant bail.
“The essence of bail is to ensure that the applicant presents himself to the authorities or the commission as in instant case, at any time his presence is needed for any investigation or questioning.
“The applicant has never jumped bail and will never jump bail if allowed to be on the administrative bail of the respondent based on the earlier bail conditions.
“The applicant has not and will not interfere with the investigation of the allegations connected with this matter by the respondent in any way.
“The sureties that undertook for the applicant are still willing, having not seen any reason to withdraw their suretyship over the applicant and available to guarantee his presence or attendance at the office of the respondent any time his presence might be needed.”