Tribunal to Give Verdict On Abiola Ajimobi VS Kola Balogun’s Case Tomorrow

Abiola Ajimobi VS Kola Balogun

Abiola Ajimobi VS Kola Balogun

The election tribunal sitting in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, has fixed tomorrow, 10th September 2019 for judgment in a petition brought before it by the All Progressives Congress, APC, against the victory of Sen. Kola Balogun of the Peoples Democratic Party.

Recall that Balogun had defeated then-governor Abiola Ajimobi of the APC in the March 23, 2019 election in Oyo South senatorial district.

We understand that the petitioner, APC, had asked the tribunal to nullify election result in the senatorial district.

In the petition number EPT/OY/SEN/12/2019, the APC, citing observed alleged irregularities in accreditation especially smart card reader report, voters on form EC8D(1), is looking up to the tribunal to nullify results in some contending units and order that a fresh election is conducted.
Leading the APC’s charge, legal practitioner, Akin Olujimi had argued that a flawed accreditation in several units across all nine local government areas that made up Oyo south senatorial district was tantamount to a flawed election.

See also  EFCC Arrests 3 Corps Members, 19 Undergraduates, 10 Others for Internet Fraud

Also relying on section 137 of the electoral act (as amended), Olujimi held that the INEC, as a maker of the electoral documents, was bound to defend the election on behalf of its elected officials, but failed to do so.

Clinging onto that section of the electoral act, Olujimi had further argued that the APC did not have the duty to bring forward presiding officers, electoral officers, returning officers across the contending units anymore but could simply make its allegation against INEC that employed all those officials.
In his own defence, counsel to INEC, S. O. Osuolale, had described the section 137 cited by the petitioner as inapplicable, adding that it was wrong for the burden of the defence to be shifted to the INEC.

See also  Mining: World Bank Increases Mineral Survey Aircraft to Four in Oyo, Other States

Osuolale argued that it was the duty of the petitioner to establish its case and get people to testify, adding that the APC had no particular evidence to support its case.
He had further argued that the petitioner failed to give evidence on how it arrived at its own result computation while questioning the candidate in question, Abiola Ajimobi, was not specifically joined in the case.

Defending his written address, counsel to Senator Kola Balogun, Tunji Ogunrinde, had asked the court to dismiss the APC’s petition.

See also  Ajimobi: Greatest Lesson I Learnt In Office As Oyo Governor

In particular, he had described the section 137 of the electoral act cited by petitioner as inapplicable, noting that the provision referred only to parties.
Noting that the case had prolonged, Ogunrinde had further asked the court to ask the APC to pay N2million.

He had also bemoaned why the petition came up noting that Ajimobi, after the declaration of the election result, had accepted the result and admitted that the election was free and fair.

Following submission of its own written address, Counsel to the PDP, Oluwasesan Dada has said the party was sure of getting an unbiased judgment by the tribunal.


About the author


Oyo Affairs is an independent news media with the main focus on Oyo state news, politics, current events, trending happenings within and around Oyo state, Nigeria

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment